- Craig Wright has continued to claim to be the true creator of Bitcoin.
- He will be calling himself as a witness in the Kleiman vs. Wright lawsuit.
The case of Kleiman vs. Wright has been going on for quite some time, and new reports show that Craig Wright will be calling witnesses at the June 28th deposition. Wright has consistently stated that he is the creator of Bitcoin, and he will be calling two expert witnesses, a fact witness, and himself to the stand. Ultimately, since Wright will already be on the stand, he opens himself up to cross-examination.
There is already a chance that Wright will end up being placed in contempt of court after he failed to provide the list of Bitcoin holdings that he kept before the end of 2013, according to CoinDesk. This failure could lead him to trouble at either the civil or criminal level.
The chief scientist for nChain had allegedly mined over 1.1 million Bitcoin with Dave Kleiman between 2009 and 2011, believed to be stored in the “Tulip Trust.” Though Kleiman has since passed, his sister Ira is suing on behalf of his estate, asking for the fair market value and rights to the intellectual property.
The court documents say that Brett Roberson will be offering his testimony regarding digital forensics and PGP signature. His experience also covers theft of intellectual property, analyzing the activities found on a computer through a specific range of time, and recovering files that have already been deleted. All of this experience can be found in his CV, which is being used as Exhibit 1.
Kevin Madure is the second expert witness, who is the former IBM consultant and VP of cybersecurity at AlixPartners. He will be testifying to cryptography, blockchain technology, and cryptocurrency, specifically in reference to how it affects this case.
The fact witness will be Steve Shadders, who is the CTO of nChain. Previously, Shadders posted a blog titled “On the Satoshiness of Dr. Craig S. Wright.” The blog discusses the reasons that Shadders believes that Wright could be the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. His statements are based on his experiences with Wright, even though he claims to have decided against seeing conclusive evidence.
To ensure that he has some kind of control over the narrative, Wright is calling himself as well. Palley, a lawyer that is following the case but is not directly involved, tweeted about the issues, saying that “criminal contempt” is still on the table.
It’s insane. Remember, the Court mentioned CRIMINAL contempt as a possibility. I doubt that will be the outcome but testifying “as a fact witness” in front of a pissed off and skeptical federal judge is a, um, bold move.
— Palley (@stephendpalley) June 26, 2019